
Lorna Tilley
Lorna Tilley is an independent researcher living in Australia who came late to bioarchaeology. She completed an honours degree in psychology at Flinders University (South Australia) and then worked in a range of public sector jobs, many dealing with aspects of health practice, health outcomes assessment and health policy development; this experience provided the foundation for her current work. Seeking a change in direction, she enrolled at the Australian National University (Canberra) and was awarded a PhD in archaeology in 2013. Lorna’s dissertation, which introduced the bioarchaeology of care and its instrument, the Index of Care, was published in 2015 as Theory and Practice in the Bioarchaeology of Care (the first volume in Springer’s Bioarchaeology and Social Theory series). She has since co-edited a volume on advances in the bioarchaeology of care approach (New Developments in the Bioarchaeology of Care: Further Case Studies and Extended Theory – Springer, 2017) and two Special Issues in the International Journal of Paleopathology on, respectively, Mummy studies and the bioarchaeology of care (2019) and Disability and care in Western Europe during Medieval times: a bioarchaeological perspective (2024). She has published a number of articles exploring application of the bioarchaeology of care methodology in different eras and under different conditions.
Phone: +61 (0)487 414941
Phone: +61 (0)487 414941
less
Uploads
Papers by Lorna Tilley
Objective
To test the hypothesis that a bioarchaeological focus on health-related care provision can contribute to the currently limited understanding of social practice in Early Anglo-Saxon England (mid5th-early7th centuries AD).
Materials
Published descriptions of pathology in 69 adult remains from the Early Anglo-Saxon cemetery of Worthy Park, southern England.
Methods
Three case studies (one examining likely need for care at an individual level and two at a population level) were undertaken using the bioarchaeology of care approach.
Results
Analyses indicate likely care provision (‘direct support’ and/or ‘accommodation of difference’) to Worthy Park individuals experiencing temporary or permanent disability. Interpretation suggests community interdependence, cooperation, flexibility and tolerance of difference, as well as cultural and socioeconomic mechanisms for managing physical and social challenges of ageing.
Conclusions
This study provides proof of concept that bioarchaeology of care analysis can offer new insights into social practice in this period.
Significance
This study demonstrates that a bioarchaeological focus on caregiving behaviours in an Early Anglo-Saxon community extends modern thinking about social relations in post-Roman Britain, offering a model for future investigations into social practice in this, and potentially other, periods. More generally, it illustrates the richness of results achievable when combining bioarchaeological and historical research.
Limitations
Reliance on secondary sources limited detail (and potentially accuracy) of interpretation possible.
Suggestions for further research
This study’s approach should be further tested and refined, either through application to different Anglo-Saxon (or other historic) populations or in a more thorough analysis of the Worthy Park sample itself.
individual may have required based on the presence of paleopathological evidence. To date, all of the research
that has employed the framework has been based on evidence derived from skeletal material. This special issue
was organized in order to highlight how the analysis of mummified soft tissue, as well as other sources of data
commonly associated with mummified remains, such as coprolites and intestinal contents, has the potential to
provide valuable insight into the reconstruction of care in the past.